A Call to All UI Designers: Do Not Play Skype’s Game

March 24, 2011 in Design Trends 16 Comments

Update:
Microsoft has an insatiable appetite for poor UI design, it seems. One more reason you should have taken my warning more seriously.

Hi fellow UI designers.

Some of you might have heard of the ongoing Chat Style Competition where Skype is trying to get UI designers submit their entries and win several prizes if their submissions get picked by a “team of experts.”

If you really love what you do, read carefully what follows. If you don’t, you can stop reading immediately.

As you might already know, Skype has upgraded their Mac client several weeks ago, and it takes no rocket scientists to notice how horrendous and borderline insulting the interface is. Too much white space, over-abundance of modal controls, inconsistent behaviors and intrusive ‘features’ (who gives an eff about the contacts I talked to two months ago??.)

However, instead of admitting that the UI is inherently flawed and hiring a good UI designer to fix it, they launched a ‘design contest’ to cover it up.

When we first launched our new Mac app, we were delighted to see so many custom styles emerge from the design community, so we thought we’d make it official.

Also reads as: When we first launched our new Mac app, we were surprised to see many custom styles emerge from the design community in an attempt to fix the crappy UI that we rolled out, so we thought we’d make it official hoping it goes unnoticed.

Their so-called “team of experts” could have spent some redesigning the current UI, and if they did so already, the chances that the winning designs would be any better are very measly.

Now some of you might be wondering why you should not answer their call, after all, it would benefit everyone, especially pixel junkies like many of us. Well, consider the following:

  • UI design is serious business and we are making a living of it. We enjoy giving away free stuff because we love what we do, but that’s no reason to work Pro Bono for a for-profit organization. If you don’t get my point, try to convince Skype and Fring to make VOIP calls on both platforms before you decide which to pay.
  • I would have given a blind eye to the bullet point above, did Skype admit their misstep and work to fix it first before letting customizers join in the fun. Painting a cracked wall won’t prevent it from falling down.
  • Such design competitions are a disguised form of spec work; they transform design into a commodity with often subpar results. There is no way in hell any company would launch an engineering or accounting competition1. Yet, many are starting to consider this route when it comes to design in order to cut costs, and it seems to be working for them as long as there are some who care little about design as a serious career path. This only shows how much these companies look down upon design, as if their products weren’t enough a proof of that already.

If you care about your credibility and dignity as a designer, please, please spread the word, retweet, let others know. You will be few to read this, but your action can make all the difference.

Footnotes
  1. Thanks for pointing me out to the Netflix Prize, but the sole fact that this counter-example got mentioned several times is a good sign that there aren’t probably many instances of such competitions.
  • Skype 5 for Mac: Followup
  • Decontextualization Kills Design
  • http://www.miekd.com/ Maykel Loomans

    Hey there Kaishin,

    These topics have been discussed greatly in different situations and contexts, but let me shine my two cents on it – as a guy who has already created a very popular chat style.

    First off, I think you are absolutely correct on calling out their euphemistic copy, because the original UI was pretty horrific. But I also want to add to that, that I have a feeling they have listened to the community, have learned a great bunch and re-iterated the UI accordingly.

    On the matter of looking down on UI Design. Honestly, I believe they are clearly taking design more seriously with Skype 5, because I started using Skype regularly ever since this version came around. Why? Because I feel that in the current version they removed a lot of UI bloat the original one had, and because I really like the one window feel – and yes, I dislike the modals too.

    Now… I agree to your stance on spec work and design contests. But I don’t think you should be talking down on their current UI team at current, because they are improving it at a decent pace now.

    The reason I don’t see this contest as the biggest problem in the world is mostly because they released a pretty basic – but very handy – UI simulator, with which I can improve Brief (regardless of wether I will enter it into the contest or not)

    I would never bother creating a Chat Style for the competition alone. My sole reasoning behind it was that I wanted to improve the chatting experience for myself and some friends of mine.

  • http://www.kaishinlab.com Kaishin

    Hi Maykel,
    Thank you very much of your lengthy comment. That is exactly the reason why I love our community and would go to any extent to protect its interests.

    I completely get your point. This competition would benefit you, me and everyone else, including my mother who is currently having major issues with the new Skype interface. Heck, I spend one third of the conversation trying to explain to her how to show/hide the chat pane…

    However, my concerns lie a layer deeper:
    - The underlying UI philosophy of the new Skype is inherently flawed. The sidebar, the contact list and just about everything else has to be reconsidered. Aesthetics won’t solve the problem.

    - Younger designers are more and more tolerant to design competitions and spec work, and this is potentially a serious threat to the viability and profitability of the design profession in the long run.

  • http://www.miekd.com/ Maykel Loomans

    Whilst you are definitely right about some of the shortcomings in the current UI, I wouldn’t call it as clear cut as the UI philosophy being wrong. Mind you, we don’t have a clear cut view about how their UI team works.

    Parts of the UI would sure be better off if reconsidered, and I believe the following quote from the blog could address this issue: “Finally, a note to those of you who have commented on the user interface as a whole. We’re in the process of developing some changes which will offer a lot more flexibility in the interface, and they’re on the roadmap for a (near) future version. Stay tuned.”

    Regarding younger designers, you are absolutely right that they are more tolerant to design competitions and spec work, but I wouldn’t necessarily say that they are more tolerant than five years back.

    Next to that I do believe that the craft of UI and UX Design has gained more respect in recent years through the influence and developments like OS X, iOS and the open design and developer community praising these improvements and each other’s designs and implementations based on it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/emperorcezar Cezar Jenkins

    “There is no way in hell any company would launch an engineering or accounting competition.”

    Netflix competition.

    I agree you can put lipstick on a bad UI design. On the otherhand, you must convince a company that you should be paid when there are thousands of others out there undercutting you.

  • http://profiles.google.com/orblivion Dan Krol

    “There is no way in hell any company would launch an engineering or accounting competition.”

    This is not true:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netflix_Prize

  • Anonymous

    That’s a good counterexample. Another one is Goldcorp crowdsourcing geological mining (http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/feb2007/id20070201_774736.htm)

  • Anonymous

    If everything is crowdsourced nobody earns a living; that’s not where I want to go…

  • http://www.kaishinlab.com Kaishin

    I didn’t say that :S How did you come to such a conclusion?

  • http://www.kaishinlab.com Kaishin

    >They do.

    I know they do, but that’s not the full fledged product. Correct me if I am wrong, but they are accepting full designs, not just mockups and sketches.

    >Why? Is free VoIP insulting to the telecom industry? Are blogs insulting to professional journalists?

    You are mixing up stuff here. There is a big difference between free trials, free speech and pro bono value-added work…

  • http://www.kaishinlab.com Kaishin

    My call is not about money, it’s about ethics of our profession. Working for free for a company who disregards what you do for a living just drives me nuts…

  • Anonymous

    Someone should submit the 2.8.xxx UI as their design. Maybe we should all do it, and they’ll take a hint.

  • http://andy.wordpress.com/ Andy

    Design competitions are not new. Your argument is as old as the tradition itself. Who do you suppose was the first to hold such a competition?

  • http://twitter.com/pbreit Patrick Breitenbach

    If people want to contribute designs to a competition and potentially have their work featured in one of the most widely used pieces of software on the planet, I don’t see the reason to discourage them. In fact, if you look at blogging and open source software, there is a huge amount of work being done either for labor of love or the chance to gain some awareness.

  • http://www.kaishinlab.com Kaishin

    Hi Patrick,
    I have written a followup piece to clarify my stance:

    http://kaishinlab.com/skype-5-for-mac-followup/

    I am not against contest or young designers getting their name out in the world, I am just talking about Skype here…

  • http://www.kaishinlab.com Kaishin

    New or not, that is not the point I am trying to get across. Skype are taking the wrong step since their current UI needs more than patchwork… Simple as that.

  • http://www.kaishinlab.com Kaishin

    I agree with you. Except that I am 100% convinced, as a professional interface designer, that changing the chat pane won’t make the Skype interface any better. This bother me more as a user than as a designer…

blog comments powered by Disqus